Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.

you google*
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)

[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]

It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. [**]
Steven Clemons: On Olbermann
Palin and the Pashtun and the Dickens it is.
Lawrence Wilkerson: on ibid. [6-22-12 Link Corrected]
A Christmas Carol meets A Wonderful Life.

Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.

footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]

[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.

[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]

1-9-14 Kant we all  ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches?  No.  Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics?  Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant.  Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics.  Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee.  (G'Ribble Label?)

Anti-semantics or...**

Parsing Semitics.
        -  /  -


Anti-Semantics.*


A. Not In My Name: Some Facebook funny-business brought the first link to my attention.
B. Facebook Empathy the 2nd insert.
C. True Torah expressions.
D. Not In My Name but whose?
-/-

* See D irony?
---


Kant we all get along without going to Hegel, or without Hume or Mill?
Thesis/Anti-Thesis/Sin-Thesis?***
---


** Work in Progress!  But before I get too fractal or tangent shall, the terminology is pertinent, what is the difference between insurgents and rhetorical terrorists?  They certainly Rn't strategic terrorists[?]  ALSO: Caution with the reading of semantics and semitics[!].  Rhetorically, why is anti-semitic a word while semitics a questionable word?  Could it be in the parsing of semitics?  Pardon the Escher-risks.
...


*** Not to Escher the Charlotte.[link is late insert not fully read]

Between Iraq and a Hard Work!

Democracy is a Hard Place!  Shock and Awe are not tools, they are weapons.  Hume or Mill will be part of the hard work.  Not to mention Kant we all get along without going to Hegel.
Pardon my aphorismal heading or mangling [!]  

Going through Hegel or...

Kant we all get along?

The Try Ad? 

Tactics
Strategy
Means
Intent

Hoyle
TruMan
Fairy Tail
Field of Carbon? 

Candy Bar?

Chicago Call?

If you think about the diamond and the pearl. (1,2,3, P C ! )
i.e. the home plate and the crowd

[gov meant don't kill people, people kill gov meant (Ctrl F nine)]
[[ speaking of slippery and plumb ? ! ]] 

D'Ribble: Diamond, Graphite, Coal, Life.
(unMbed Straw Elephant from Borax)

Our Future dot Org

OFDO: Campaign For America's Future

I really should have noted new PAGES on the dates* they were instituted. 

*6-4-13

(The Place for Politics:  Shoe on the other FOX[!])

Kant we all get a lung?  Seriously!  Really! [?]

PC [^]

Pathological[!] Corner*

Kant we all get along without going to Hegel?
Not without Hume or Mill.
Forgot the punch line.**

* (b.s. )
** the third clause will come to me(was it the bottom line?)

[!] =  "..." or (sic){L} (i.e.) ePH'n pun
Related googles: a, b, c

Inspiration: perspectivism on progress
[Un-PC or Ahegelian? Or Perspective Catch.]

11-23-13 The Foundation [!]***

*** routing branches (knot too frack) Hegelian Punditry
{spoiler alert} [^]  R "air quotes" needed?

Connecting the Dots

Kant we all get along without going to Hegel, or without a Hume or* Mill?**
Knot too tangent ?

*not too go here ?
[General Obstruction Party?]

4-20-13 CBC Day 6
**(original) "or without Hume or* Mills?"
(Fair and Balanced? EA / hosts)

Not so Pacific[!]

Rand Paul the Obama of the Right [ ! ] *

* or new GOP
[ABC to different extents (FP1).]   
[Kant we all get along without going to Hegel?]

Our Story

Not history (2)

or her story...

but Kant (1) we all get it rather than go all gotcha?

No daylight means no dialogue and only darkness.

(1)   De-Cap #Sine**  (footnote*)
* just NOW! (Hegelian Philosophy)
** Re:Kant?
(2) Re:Heading  Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?

Kant we all...

get along without going to Hegel? 

or Well? 

(FP1) /- To read, to maybe read.

[Saved in Draft]

All Blank are not created equally.

Under 4eh[!]

OK, one of the A's was "anecdotal".  Not only that it was an old story and not much of one.
(Open carry robbed of gun at gun point.)
One of the four blank or Hume or everything. 
"Kant we get along..." etc.
Let alone Bane or...Mill.
Let alone "Math is next to..." rhetoric of the I ron knee age.

Just because you think(...) doesn't mean someone is not.
Tan gent: Hegelian Fallacy. 

https://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html

http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hegelian+dialectic*

http://www.therightplanet.com/2014/01/hegelian-dialectics-for-dummies/

*Not to mention, not all links are created equal.

[  http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm ]

An  Inconvenient Truth ?

Or unweaving of a quilt?

[2A] Academics is like congress, you have to remember there is always perspectivism. 

dunn dunn done[!]?

Bruticus Sardonicus[!]*

~We are physics, psychology and philosophy being.  Speaking of Try ads or Hegel or bane or or whoa man, politics is the pinnacle and base.
“The rational alone is real.”  “presupposition of the empirical movement”
1. a. "Timing is everything.",* b. Foe Cult, c. Lame
2. William Castle Trailer
3.   BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger" , escapement? , Middle C? !

4. a. Connecting the Dots, b. Anti-semantics or...**, c. PC [^], d. Kant we get along... e. Between Iraq and a Hard Work!, f. fnp-11-13.
5. a. Un-Exceptionalism, b. In the begining..., c. Flow of Conscience, d. Punderous Ponderings

* See Quido(Sarducci) under bru
[also (*2) under "Timing is everything"]
Disregard ** under 4b as already in heading.
*#3 D-cap (b.s.)(s.c.) blog search/scroll click or knot[!]

~ my amalgam contribushun
Ra-shunall[?]

THE COUNCIL OF NICE

versus THE COURSE OF TRICKLE DOWN:

What we need is a Council of Nice, and anyone who does not want to be, can go to a place of their own choosing or can choose who will tell them where to go, and see if that gets them there.

But seriously, it would be nice if we had a benevolent dictator, but would that really stop the blaming?

Talk about having a polarized choice...this should at least argue for more choice, but others think that even the argument is not needed. Where will that get us?

Apparently they think the ultimate place, and that is hard to argue.

[This was composed following the June 30th 20/20 and saved in draft after a few posts on their message board into July 1st and first emailed in present form on July 8th.]

THE LIAISON REPORT:
Between Common Sense and Kant
[Just a quick tangent on the topic of where this is coming from:]

My thinking is somewhere between what Bush thinks is common sense and just thinking that one is thinking. It may be all about me: a wannabe pundit, benevolent dictator and general do-gooder. But seriously, somewhere between what the press should have been wondering and where Bush wonders not.

But back from that tangent, a new book apparently has done much of the research on what I merely quipped about.[Hint: Not so far fetched, as the principle is that we would all love to be dictators.] But of course most people do not want to filter through what academics have worked on, but that is the point of his book, there are those that think they are free and those that don't know they are not. It may not be that simple, but it's title is: Conservatives Without Conscience by John Dean.

See Democracy in a Republic is not Black and White

Running on What? Rhetorical Slipperiness. for my comments about the problem of following no matter what.

For those who hate "hard work":
Some people will tell you where to go. Others will take you there.

Bury the lede?

Or bury the hatchet?(1)

To be cautious, I am speaking of journalism and myth.  To be clear, I have not finished viewing the latter, but the former is certainly an example of Popperism and both contain quilting.**  



Facebook Being Liberal

FYI wars?

(1) YouTubes: [Social Darwinism 1] counterexample? [Bill Gates...Alex Jones]
c. Too Random... / A Tale of Two Manicheans.
d. The Hegel Myth and Its Method
e.^ Proxymoron? / Social Darwinism? / Social Darwinism 2.0[!] / Catch-44 / Pink Floyd / (FP) / Di-Spencer With... /  (FP)  / Battle of Amendments? /  Now the Un-Voodoo Math / Un-Social Darwinism. / The Daily Counter Balance / Where everyone needs to read... / "a royal huff" / Mocumentary: Expelled (Exposed?)

[Label check*, with all the irony of the History Channel.]

* Social Darwinism label as of this date: Bury the lede? / Kant we get along... / 2 Reid's later? / Di-Spencer With...
^ the un-quilting of Social Darwinism
un-related?
** quilting: Ctrl F "quilt"
[Re:genre?] HA !